Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren White (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone who participated. Please keep all responses to closure civil. If you wish to contest the results, please visit deletion review. Missvain (talk) 23:56, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Darren White (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability, no credible sources, don't think it pass WP:NACTOR FITINDIA फ़िटइंडिया (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete inadequate sources to demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lead & Ink (talk • contribs) 09:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article was nominated for deletion 39 minutes after its creation. You need to allow more time. There are now adequate sources to demonstrate notability. Cyclic Learning (talk) 11:46, 12 June 2016 (GMT+1)
The above two comments one by the creator of the page and the other user unsigned comment User registered on 2016-06-11 and has only made edits to [1] Darren White (actor)--- FITINDIA (talk) 10:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Lack of substantial coverage from reliable sources. Doesn't appear to satisfy general notability guidelines. Article's creator has expressed a desire to delete article. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Given the creator's attempts to blank the page, this is eligible for speedy deletion. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: Lead & Ink is a Confirmed sock of Cyclic Learning. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyclic Learning.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.