Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Matter Time Projection Chamber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Time projection chamber. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Matter Time Projection Chamber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Technology. UtherSRG (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• We have quite some academic papers talking about this experiment/device. See [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. I think those are some sigcov from reliable sources, and I am inclined to keep. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I would agree with keeping the page, as there seem to be references available, they just haven't been added in. Madeleinehales (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC) :)[reply]

• merge with dark matter. The experiment is real but just one of many and readers would be better served by seeing the content in context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnjbarton (talk • contribs)

• Hello Anon, that is also a valid point. In that sense, I think it will be better to merge with Time projection chamber as an example of these kinds of facilities. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 14:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Time projection chamber is a better choice, with a sentence in dark matter linking.

Johnjbarton (talk) 21:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess sources brought up in this discussion and also the possibility of a Merge (although 2 different Merge targets are suggested).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Mates, it seems that there is enough coverage by scholarly articles. [8]. So, Keep. Cinadon36 19:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Same relisting rationale.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I would support a merge. Time projection chamber seems better, with a mention at dark matter. UtherSRG (talk) 10:44, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.