Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danni Bennatar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danni Bennatar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, The article's been unsourced since its creation (2008) and there's nothing on Google - not even 1 mention, They appear to meet NACTOR however they fail GNG –Davey2010^Talk 22:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete IMDb is not a reliable source for our purposes, despite the intent of some Wikipedia is not meant to be as comprehensive as IMDb, and so we need something else as a source to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and close this Afd. I've found a BBC source with just a mention of the actor. If i had had more reliable sources (even mere mentions), I would have argued with the nom that meeting NACTOR (which the nominator agrees) is enough for a keep. However, as the nom mentions, I am not able to find more than a single source for the subject. Lourdes 10:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.