Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Hoover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Hoover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability and zero sources (other than IMDB) in the article since 2008. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Even though the article doesn't say so, the subject's more recent credits are for writing rather than acting. There are a number of Deadline Hollywood articles that mention her in that capacity (e.g., https://deadline.com/2016/10/jj-totah-star-nbc-comedy-adam-naomi-scott-1201844962/), so I would encourage voters take this into consideration when evaluating her notability. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per Nom. A search produced nothing substantial and added Deadline source has some specific to subject but not significant coverage. Could not find anything substantial providing nothing more than a couple of sentences of a pseudo biography.
  • Comments: Source and article review

• Alien Arsenal (1999): Film review with name drop of Danielle Hoover (Baxter)
• BFI name drop, place of birth.
• External links:
• IMDb, filmography with date and place of birth. Not an acceptable source.
• BW names subject as "screenwriter, actor, and co-producer"
• Encyclopedia of Unaired Television Pilots, 1945-2018: Movie concept Otr500 (talk) 05:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Otr500, there is another review for Alien Arsenal, which provides slightly more than a mere mention, at a site called Efilmcritic.com: https://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=5056. I don't know if there is a consensus regarding this site's reliability, though—do you? Thanks, Dflaw4 (talk) 07:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply: The review seems legit but you can check this page out, concerning eligibility to be a critic for that company, and it might give some insight as to why I would not rate the reliability very high. It may not be required but I would hold more regard to a critic that was associated with the National Society of Film Critics, New York Film Critics Circle, (See Category:American film critics associations) or other more "official" membership. In Australia there is the Film Critics Circle of Australia (FCCA), ABC Radio National, Australian Film Critics Association (AFCA), also International Federation of Film Critics (FIPRESCI), and many others that would be more "prestigious". This is just my opinion but has logic if notability is questioned. Otr500 (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, Otr500. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination and Otr500's forensics per above. Subject failrs WP:NACTOR. -The Gnome (talk) 17:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable as either an actress or screenwriter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.