Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel S. Severson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel S. Severson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable lawyer. Editor of one of Harvard Law Schools important journals, but that is by its nature a single-year position. Nothing else that's possibly notable DGG ( talk ) 19:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:Too soon. As discussed before, short-term editorships do not qualify for WP:Prof#C8. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as unconvincing and nothing significant yet. SwisterTwister talk 02:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, especially DGG and Xxanthippe. I was a managing editor of a law journal, which by itself is run of the mill. He fails my standards for lawyers, as of now. These notes are not meant to be an insult - he appears to have a promising and lucrative career ahead of him - it's just way too soon for a Wikipedia article. Bearian (talk) 12:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject is on track to become a notable lawyer, but he has not made it there yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails.non notable lawyer.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.