Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ryder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Ryder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails NHOCKEY and GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NHOCKEY, though his legal problems sets him apart infamously. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability guidelines for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 15:07, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am leaning keep as he has been covered in his hockey a little bit. But there is a tonne of coverage surrounding his legal and health troubles. -DJSasso (talk) 15:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There is quite a bit of coverage about him - a lot about his legal issues, some about his health issues, and even some specifically about hockey, such as this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlendog (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 11:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and routine sports coverage is not enough to meet GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 17:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.