Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Osgerby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 13:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Osgerby

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent notability. Provides sources do not establish any notability whatsoever. Seems to fail WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 20:08, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add: also, created by User:Wildfirestudios, which appears to be a single purpose promotional account. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 20:10, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems to be WP:TOOSOON at this stage with mainly short film roles and one-episode tv roles so WP:NACTOR is not passed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.