Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danica Heller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danica Heller

Delete. Google searches for Danica Heller, "Danica Heller", Heller murder baltimore and Danica Heller 1976 yield no search results relevant to this topic (the second only yields two search results overall). If this murder is as notable as the article claims, there would certainly be ample material available outside wikipedia, but since this appears not to be the case I am led to conclude that it is a hoax. Vectro 01:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Whether a hoax or not, it's a 100% WP:V violation. --Aaron 01:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like a hoax. --- RockMFR 01:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This story seems too good to be true and sounds like a short horror tale. The name should be on the Internet but two sources (with the same database) show irrelevant results. I am certain that this is a hoax. I'm not suprised there aren't any sources for this information... Sr13 02:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pretty good for a hoax, but still a hoax. - Richfife 01:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's not really believable, let alone verifiable. "Police officers were struck by her beauty". James086 02:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as probable hoax. Some details are suspiciously similar to the real-life case of the Black Dahlia. Others are typical of Halloween horror-fairytales. The story is so hugely bizarre that it would certainly have made local if not national news, so it ought to be on the Web -- or at least in the archives of the Baltimore Sun. But it ain't on the Web and I'll bet you a $2 bill it's not in the Sun's archives, either. Alba 04:31, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete I am a born and raised resident of Baltimore, and I can say with all confidence this is as clear of a hoax as I have EVER seen, hon. Wildthing61476 14:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Wildthing61476. -- P.B. Pilhe t / Talk 16:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh... Yeah, I'm actually from Alabama, but I have cousins in Baltimore who told me about it. If it's not real, it wasn't be intention. They seem to believe it. I'll search for sources. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nanaszczebrzeszyn (talk • contribs) 12:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- Note: Nanaszczebrzeszyn is the original creator of the article in question. Vectro 18:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Great story, but I am positive that it isn't true. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 18:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete every indication of a hoax, and no sources to boot. I just wonder if we can WP:SNOW this one?-- danntm ^T _C 19:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I wasn't trying to hide the fact that I am the author of the article. I was just saying that I didn't intentionally post something I knew wasn't true.
Delete, more hoaxery from the person who kept recreating Asstree, Alabama. NawlinWiki 20:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even non-net literary refernces (real or otherwise) are cited. As far as I cant tell right now, it's fiction. --Marriedtofilm 23:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.