Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daneen Boone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Adventures of Justine. (non-admin closure) Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 17:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daneen Boone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not establish that this meets WP:ENT or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 16:10, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Although pageviews average around 25, didn't find sources after checking 10 SERP pages, so doesn't meet the GNG as far as I can tell.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - title/lead role in a series of seven well-known (at least for the addicts of late-night cable television) telefilms. Hektor (talk) 10:55, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actors get or don't get articles on the basis of the quality of reliable sourcing that can or cannot be added about them to the article, and are not entitled to an automatic presumption of notability just because they exist. No number of roles in no number of films makes an actor eligible for an article on here if the sourcing isn't there to support one. Bearcat (talk) 01:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Adventures of Justine, the only work she's "known" for. --damiens.rf 17:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of reliable sourcing. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when the sourcing can be substantively beefed up. Bearcat (talk) 01:50, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Adventures of Justine. I agree with comment above. AAA3AAA (talk) 09:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.