Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daivathinte naalvayikal

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 06:14, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daivathinte naalvayikal

Daivathinte naalvayikal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unremarkable book, if it exists. CarnivorousBunnytalk 16:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The book's title seems to be more commonly transliterated as Dhaivathinte Nalvazhikal. --Bejnar (talk) 06:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The book may exist, the Ernakulam Public Library has cataloged a copy here but gives it a status of "not issued". It was published by Green Books. I found no coverage of the author. The only review I found was an image of a Malayalam review that had been posted to Facebook here, although I did find several booksellers willing to sell a copy. Both author and book appear to be totally without notability. Book fails WP:GNG and has no basis for notability from WP:NBOOK. I did search the Malayalam title as given in the Wikipedia article, but got no hits. --Bejnar (talk) 07:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Godsy(TALKCONT) 03:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.