Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaDuDiDo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DaDuDiDo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails basic WP:GNG guideline. Non notable film sourced with only self sources. My attempt to find sources yielded no any reliable sources that reported about this — Ammarpad (talk) 13:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete self promotional, non notable, unsourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David.moreno72 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Ammarpad (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Ammarpad (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My attempts to locate significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject (From WP:GNG; emphasis not mine) via Google News have failed, as evidenced by this search. Offline sources are unlikely, given the show's release date. Google Books sources are also unlikely. Most of the eight sources listed there only contained passing mentions, and all contents were far from what is considered to be significant coverage. Easy delete. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 03:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete dubious notability if only source provided is youtube. LibStar (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete Per J947. Also did a search. Galobtter (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Promotional, conflict of interest non notable film. FailsWP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are some Malaysian news sites that have coverage on the topic. However, it seems to be the case of mere trivial mention and no in-depth coverage was found. I think it should be deleted for now.Dial911 (talk) 06:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.