Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D Glenn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

D Glenn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which discuss the artist in detail. Marked for improvement on this point for nine years. joe decker ^talk 22:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete appears to be a vanity page. No sources out there. Source in article is an archive of his/her own site.198.58.168.40 (talk) 18:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Glenn's website no longer exists; maybe Glenn has retired. Anyway, the July 2011 version of Glenn's "about" page has a moderate number of claims but not a single one of them is supported by a tearsheet or similar; and even if they're all demonstrably true, none of them is significant. -- Hoary (talk) 01:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being a published photographer in and of itself is not enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- fails to meet threshold of notability as photographer. Concur particularly with @Hoary. Quis separabit? 18:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.