Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYBE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYBE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently defunct station which is left unreferenced for more than 10 years. There's barely any source about it. It is not even listed in the 2011 listing and 2019 listing by the NTC. Fails WP:BCAST. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fails GNG as it is sourced entirely to primary sources. Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.