Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWNP (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A decision to restore the redirect can happen outside of this AfD. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:37, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DWNP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply does not meet WP:BROADCAST. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I would vote to restore the redirect, except that an internet search suggests that this initialism is used to refer to possibly more notable subjects. Delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ミラP 01:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It's given that the station exists per 2019 NTC Listing. One reference explains about the station's launch and programs. Therefore, the article is good enough to pass WP:BROADCAST. I rest my case. _SUPER ^ASTIG 23:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep city of 41,000 people, we should WP:ATD. I think the station meets the SNG WP:BROADCAST. Wm335td (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.