Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNA Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to DNA Productions. MBisanz ^talk 02:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DNA Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. There is nothing that satisfies WP:GNG and everything available falls short of WP:CORPDEPTH. Does not appear to be in business any longer and the references I do find are simply directory listings. CNMall41 (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak redirect to DNA Productions. 165.91.13.63 (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - How are these related to each other? I don't see anything other than they share a similar name. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to DNA Productions as I've seen at least four news articles referring to DNA Productions as DNA Studio or similar (e.g. here and here). Redirects are to aid searching as well as providing sub-topics and misspellings, by the way. Nothing can I find at Google News Archive and my original Google News search was mainly talking about DNA Productions. My second gnews search to narrow it down proved to find no substantial coverage. The four articles in the last search were:

• MediaPost's Something Massive Becomes Even More So, Acquires Circ.us, Gets Into 'Post-PC' Act has 24 words at the most in the fourth paragraph, thus failing to account for significant coverage.
• PR Web's DEI Worldwide Names Gunther Sonnenfeld as Vice President of Digital and Social Media is noted as a press release, thus failing to account for significant coverage.
• TVBlog.it's Palinsesti Mediaset autunno 2017, conferenza stampa: tutte le dichiarazioni] is from a blog, thus failing to meet our standards for reliable sources.
• The Atlantic's Designing a Better Public Toilet has not a mention and I don't know why it came up.

Finally, a Google Books search also confuses the two, thus strengthening my stance to redirect. J947 ^{(c · m)} 04:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.