Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D. K. Gupta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 02:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D. K. Gupta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Delete. Fails WP:BIO, lacks reliable sourcing, and notability is not inherited anyhow. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 19:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Sorry to say. Was able to find one source in the Hindu News, but that was about it. If someone can provide sourcing I have no problem changing my opinion. ShoesssS ^Talk 20:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Per WP:BIO. asenine ^{say what?} 21:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails notablity per WP:BIO. Article has no reliable sources at the moment. --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 23:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unsourced with no assertion of notability. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 04:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The article cannot be kept unless and until reliable sources are provided to assert notability. The article could not be retained simply because D. K. Gupta has something to do with Satyajit Ray because of Wikipedia:BIO#Invalid criteria-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 14:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.