Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cybertonica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:41, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cybertonica

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to satisfy WP:NORG. The sources appear to be based on press releases or paid adverts. Unable to find WP:RS with a WP:BEFORE. The creator is a SPA. Vikram Vincent 05:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 05:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 05:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 05:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A non notable company. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Sliekid (talk) 13:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.