Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curse of Keith Hernandez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 20:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made up on a blog and mentioned in a newspaper column, 160 Ghits, doesn't seem to be notable to me. BoojiBoy 21:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Me either. Delete all purported baseball curses except the actual notable ones: the Babe, the goat, and the ex-Cubs. Fan1967 21:43, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • What about the Curse of Rocky Colavito? It had a book written about it. That appears to be the only other baseball-related curse left. BoojiBoy 22:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • It had a book written about it by the guy who invented it. Only problem with the concept is that the Indians had problems (to put it politely) long before the Colavito trade. Seems the fans of other losing teams were jealous of the Cubs and Bosox for having an excuse, so they invented curses of their own. Fan1967 22:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable curse. --Coredesat 22:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable curse.--Nick Y. 23:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 01:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Leave it, as it has been noted by the local paper of the team to which it applies. Unless, of course, the Cardinals win the 2006 World Series. -- Pacholeknbnj, 7:00 PM EDT, June 28, 2006

• Above actually posted by 128.6.205.83 (talk · contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.