Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Currae Hospital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus for a specific outcome has occurred herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Currae Hospital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Of the 4 sources, 2 are the company's own website, one is an advert in the Times of India, and the last is about the owner's investments. None refer to Currae in a reliable, verifiable, independent manner. Cabayi (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Its a poor article but a cursory consultation with Dr Google producs plenty of independent reporting. It's clearly notable.Rathfelder (talk) 23:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - seems to be a notable and large chain of hospitals Spiderone 13:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The Times of India is a fairly respectable source. Rathfelder (talk) 17:21, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on coverage in Times of India[1], Live Mint[2], The Hindu BusinessLine[3]. --DBigXrayᗙ 09:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability. The "Keep" !voters above appear to have a basic misunderstanding of the criteria for notability which is a stricter set of criteria for references to support facts within an article. For example, the Time of India reference is an example of "Dependant coverage" as it is based on a company announcement and therefore fails WP:ORGIND. Similarly the livemint reference is based on an announcement/interview by Patni and fails WP:ORGIND for the same reason. An additional reason is that the topic of this article, Currae Hospital, is only mentioned in passing and the reference also therefore fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Finally, the Hindu Business Line reference fails for the same reasons as above - dependent coverage based on announcement/interview and fails ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where do you imagine content about organizations is going to come from if not on announcements and interview? Rathfelder (talk) 20:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • How about independent third-party sources? Your comment above shows that you don't understand the criteria for establishing notability of organizations. Perhaps you should read WP:NCORP before commenting further? HighKing⁺⁺ 22:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Newspapers and magasines are generally accepted as independent third-party sources. The fact that they may base their coverage on press releases does not alter that. What other independent sources would you like to see? And kindly dont litter your comments with rude remarks. It doesn't help the spirit of collaboration. Rathfelder (talk) 08:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.