Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuong Nhu
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nominator withdrew their nomination, and no other !votes (other than the nomination) to delete were posted. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 21:33, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cuong Nhu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication this is a notable martial art. The world headquarters claims that there are 70 schools worldwide and I don't think that's enough to show notability for a martial art. There are no independent sources in the article. Papaursa (talk) 23:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are sufficient sources to show this art is notable. My nomination was in error. Papaursa (talk) 16:48, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 23:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Never having heard of it I immediately found half a dozen English sources in Google Books, and also a couple of sources back in Vietnam - where it is viewed as American. It's not massively notable and the article is badly written and sourced, but this is a case of improve not delete. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.