Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultural differences between Kazakhstan and Malaysia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. There is agreement that although well written, this is not an encyclopaedic article. Should the author wish to recover the content, they can request that it be emailed to them. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:22, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural differences between Kazakhstan and Malaysia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This isn't really an article but a discussion on the differences between two very different cultures based on them having signed a Memorandum of Understanding and Cooperation in Tourism. There is no real encyclopedic content and the Perspectives section is a discussion among fictional characters. The sources do not seem to discuss the subject matter but not really supporting the title. In other words there seems to be no discussion in scholarly works supporting this. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Malaysia and Kazakhstan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete oh dear someone has put a huge amount of work into this but it’s a personal essay full of WP:SYNTH. There are probably elements that can be merged into Culture of Malaysia and Culture of Kazakhstan but that’s a huge task. Mccapra (talk) 11:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I hope this person gets a good grade on their assignment, but they have misunderstood what Wikipedia is for. This is not a notable subject discussed in reliable sources. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. A brilliant essay, but unfortunately not suitable for Wikipedia. It might be worth informing the creator that they can request a copy of a deleted article if they wish, if/when the article is deleted, seeing as so much work has appeared to of been put into it. HenryTemplo (talk) 15:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:52, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Alex Bakharev (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sorry to see this much effort go to waste, but really, this is a personal essay, not an encyclopedia article. JIP | Talk 20:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps this could be userfied, in case the author did not keep another copy for whatever this essay is intended for. CMD (talk) 22:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article is just WP:SYNTH. LibStar (talk) 00:13, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is well-written, but unfortunately the aspect of notability is missing, and I wish there was a way or a process to facilitate articles of this type. No self-promotion is intended here, except for the fact that it appears to be an excellent essay. I especially like the cultural maps! Proton Dental (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.