Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cultivated Indian English

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Indian English. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cultivated Indian English

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable at all. Only source I saw noting it was an opinion site, plus the article doesn't establish anything that would make me consider this significant. Wizardman 00:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is currently no indication of notability and I could not find any reliable sources on the subject itself. Elspamo4 (talk) 01:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Indian English. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

redirect to Indian English -Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:15, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect – to Indian English. But it looks like OR to me. It exists at Indian English because the same author recently put it there. He has added the same vowel table to Indian English and Received Pronunciation, but it was deleted from Received Pronunciation as dubiously sourced. I added a couple of {{cn}} tags to Indian English, as this tripartite division of Cultivated/Standard/Regional might be OR and needs to be checked. See Talk:Received Pronunciation#New table. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.