Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown Crafts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Crafts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious case of no better notability and improvement with the best my searches finding this, this, this and this and this current version is even speedy and PROD material. Pinging Whpq, Vegaswikian, Rich Farmbrough and author Zanimum. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete - no sources, self promotion article. non-notable. DangerDogWest (talk) 07:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep sources fairly easy to find. Six added so far. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]
  

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.