Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdfunder.co.uk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:39, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crowdfunder.co.uk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable crowdfunding startup, no claim to notability. GoldenRing (talk) 14:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing remarkable, nothing notable. It's just another crowd-funding business - Wikipedia isn't a directory. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'd say at the moment it fails WP:GNG and WP:NCOMPANY. There is not enough coverage and such coverage has does not have significant WP:DEPTH. Most coverage is from the source "Crowdfund Insider" which I view with less weight given the close association of sources. Other than that, there is [1] and passing mention at [2] & [3] - not enough to swing me. Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me!} 15:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All references are from the site itself and not reliable sources, meaning that the sources aren't independent. There really need to be independent sources covering it if it were to be notable. --Rlin8 (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article seems suspicious and has many hallmarks of WP:PAID. Copyvio material and very promotional from an WP:SPA. The article clearly doesn't meet our notability guidelines for organizations nor does it have enough significant coverage for inclusion. Mkdw ^talk 05:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No claim to notability and it seems thr author has a COI. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.