Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristiana of Capua and Adelaide of Riedenburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cristiana of Capua

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because they are hardly ever referenced by reliable sources. Adelaide is only referenced by the 1993 source and Stephen II of Hungary's wife is mentioned in reliable sources as an unnamed princess of Capua. The name Christiana seems made up. Both women are not notable and never mention in detail by sources. Most information about them are made up in later sources, Merging should not even be an option. Both articles should be deleted and all links and mentions on related articles erased to prevent Wikipedia for proliferating false facts and original research. See also Talk:Stephen II of Hungary#Wives.

I am nominating the following related page.

The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 06:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. As per above argumentation. 12:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Borsoka (talk)

Support. Even though short, they would be nice entries if they had any sort of reliable references, which both lack. So, as per the above arguments, I support their deletion.Onel5969 (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Concur that sourcing is very sparse. These two articles are practically orphans already, further recognition that the sources about Stephen don't provide anything to support these pages. The Capua one is linked from List of Hungarian monarchs, but that's about it. 1bandsaw (talk) 00:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.