Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimson Fields

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Trebor 20:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crimson Fields

My concern is this game's notability. The article claims the game is popular, but there are no independent references provided to back this up. I can find plenty of directory entries [1] [2] and download sites but not much else. Marasmusine 07:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 07:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:Notability and lack of independant sources --Childzy ¤ Talk 08:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my comment below, I list two sources. Please reconsider the second part of your argument for deletion, including the new information in your considerations. User:Krator (t c) 13:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - this game seems widespread throughout the internet, and from what I can see, it looks to have a variety of skins / styles via varying sites. Can we not just leave it a bit and see how the game progresses regarding popularity? Having said this however, I've never heard of or seen it till now. Lra drama 09:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - The game has been around for some time. Most notably it has been ported to pocket pc devices. However the article does not provide any 3rd party coverage as required by WP:N. All the external links are sites offering the download of said game. My point: It's known to a certain extent however no sources are cited. 1redrun ^Talk 10:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Passes the Google test, and seems to have reasonable coverage in reliable sources, e.g. [3] [4]. Weak because it concerns a niche area, but keep nonetheless. User:Krator (t c) 13:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the two links above? User:Krator (t c) 12:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.