Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CricNepal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CricNepal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet web notability criteria. Article lacks reliable sources, almost all citations are self published from the website itself. Can't find any sources online from non-trivial published works that demonstrate notability. Article also seems to have been created by the website's founder and has been deleted multiple times previously. Jevansen (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Agree with the nominator, can't find any significant coverage in independent sources. Jenks24 (talk) 08:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.