Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CreoType

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 01:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CreoType (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to lack independent coverage. FuFoFuEd (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Baseball Watcher 17:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Software does not indicate significance. "Source" appears to be links to other websites.--v/r - TP 00:12, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no 3rd party refs to establish notability of this software. Dialectric (talk) 09:14, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.