Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creditseva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creditseva

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A company with no significant, independent and in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Fails NCORP and GNG. M4DU7 (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 02:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Searches find start-up product and financing coverage, plus a Hot 100: Race to Grace 2017 award, which is not inherently notable. There is also a later item discussing data breach rumours [1], but that is effectively a case study. The company's acquisition by AsiaCollect in October 2018 is not mentioned in the present article. I am not seeing the coverage about the company needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above Spiderone 14:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.