Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creditninja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pinging @DannyS712: as requested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creditninja

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, almost certainly UPE, promotional garbage. Most source are black-hat SEO sites or otherwise are not reliable, none establish notability. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. An excessively promotional page for an unremarkable company, falls far short of WP:CORPDEPTH. One of the two editors of this page bas been perma-banned for undisclosed paid editing of this and related pages. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 15:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. If the closing admin would be so kind, please ping me when this is closed so that I can delete the wikidata item (came here after the item was listed at wikidata's requests for deletion, where the deletion is on hold given that it currently has a valid site link) --DannyS712 (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.