Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credit hustling
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Credit hustling
- Credit hustling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The definition of a term fails WP:NAD and WP:NOTNEO. Does not meet WP:GNG. Ochiwar (talk) 07:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Can't find any significant coverage where this term was used; it doesn't even come up in Urban Dictionary. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 07:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is a real thing that does happen (though uncommon), but I've never heard this term for it. We already have a Cheating in casinos article, but I wouldn't redirect there as this seems to be a neologism. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is an actual thing, attested and notable per reliable sources, then it could be merged to Slot machine#Terminology. But if, as Erpert and Andrew Lenahan each suggest, it is a largely unattested neologism, then delete it. (Google Books backs up that contention: I find only one use of term there.) In either case, it is a dictionary definition and doesn't seem very likely to expand beyond that. Cnilep (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.