Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy King

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 06:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy King

Crazy King (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cant find anything notable about him, Doesn't meet the notability standards of WP:NMUSIC.The whole article is written like a advert, probably a case of conflict of interest. RazerText me 05:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. Seems to be a promotional page, already speedy deleted twice. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 13:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do Not DeleteI object to the deletion, It was speedy deleted twice because of low content and no information but I have uploaded information about the subject Wikipedia is all about encyclopedia which means to provide information about a personality and who has a digital presence too, nothing in this article is promotional and nothing is offline research based, all the stuff in this article is based on the information which is spread over internet and boosted by internet.Rahilljoshi5 00:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable musician who does not meet any of the musician notability criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:15, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • On what grounds not notable should be notable in USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahilljoshi5 (talkcontribs) 01:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Rahilljosh15: Please read the notability guidelines and tell us which criteria this person meets. It doesn't have anything to do with where he is from. 331dot (talk) 02:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So this simply means that this article should be accepted because this person is notable in India.Rahilljoshi5 02:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahilljoshi5 (talkcontribs)

How is he notable in India? Please read the criteria and tell us which one or ones he meets. 331dot (talk) 02:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please Keep you can find much more result, if search is Crazy King Rapper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahilljoshi5 (talkcontribs) 06:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC) The subject is popular in regular search, might not much in news, but popular in newspaper Rahilljoshi5 06:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahilljoshi5 (talkcontribs) [reply]

@Rahilljosh15: We get that you are telling us that he is 'popular'. We need to know how he is notable. Please read the guidelines here and tell us how. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He is notable for his live perfomances, specially when he dedicated a song to Akshay Kumar and his no worries attitude, which was marked a great impression when, daringly commented on Honey Singh, his performances with Dharmesh Yalende, Vrinda Dawde and Paulami Mazumdar and his last song Apna Star which is now becoming popular. He is a youth Icon according Hungama Music, as his rap has a complete Marwari+Hariyani touch. Rahilljoshi5 00:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahilljoshi5 (talkcontribs) As I put all my points till date, wiki has its own rules and every wikipedian is an intellect. So, I respect all of you, what you people decide would be happily acceptable. If this article is deleted then I will make sure that whenever I redesign this article, there should be optimum pre-requisite completed and I will be thankful if it is accepted. :) Rahilljoshi5 05:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahilljoshi5 (talkcontribs) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.