Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crap Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Na Na Hey Hey Kiss Him Goodbye -- Mike (Kicking222) 20:50, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crap Art (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

One guy's made up word. Clubmarx 23:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —Clubmarx 23:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Wow. No doubts here. Make something up, stick it on Wikipedia. Instant notability. freshacconcispeaktome 00:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, if it deserves a mention anywhere it's on Album-a-Day, unless it can be shown that it's widely used - and it certainly doesn't seem to be. Most mentions of "crap art" have nothing to do with this 'movement'. -- Mithent 01:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as it seems like an attempt at astroturfing. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 06:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. - Modernist 12:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete because while it is verified by reliable sources, it seems to be a gimmick that is really a neologism. Bearian 00:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it should just be noted on Album-a-Day (if that page, itself doesn't need an AFD discussion) Ctjf83 19:55, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.