Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cranial Screwtop

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Traintalk 06:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cranial Screwtop

Cranial Screwtop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My PROD was removed but recent changes have not address the notability issue. The sources added are not indepth secondary sources but rather routine schedule reports and programs. Hence this still fails WP:NBAND and doesn't meet WP:GNG. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 06:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 06:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 06:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for previous comments and suggestions, which have been acted upon. The issue is now moving towards a question of notability within the field/genre. While I'd certainly agree that, for the sake of Wikipedia, it's important to 'cull' a large number of lesser music entries, it's important to be consistent here; to maintain a sustainable deletion strategy, and to acknowledge that there is an important element of subjectivity within particular areas - perhaps especially the arts and humanities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktipps (talkcontribs) 08:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I don't know what the comment above is trying to say, but anyway, the current sources comprise a link to the website of a local radio station and not to a recording of the actual programme, a gig listing at a local pub from the local paper, one line from a BBC programme that says "'Planet Earth' was covered by UK pop punk band Cranial Screwtop in 2006 and by William Shatner in 2011" (it's at 15:40 minutes on the iPlayer link, if anybody wants to search for it), a blog list of Depeche Mode song covers, and a list of all the artists who have used a particular recording studio. None of that demonstrates notability or that the subject passes WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Richard3120 (talk) 10:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- does not meet WP:NBAND and significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.