Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Murray (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 18:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Murray (disambiguation)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page not needed. At present we really only have two articles with this name, so they can be dealt with by a hatnote. If more articles are created with this name, and they survive any notability challenge, we can create a disambiguation page, but not before then. PatGallacher (talk) 13:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are 4 different people on the page, and in the encyclopedia, and disentangling them is a useful service. PamD 14:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Disambiguations. ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 14:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nomination doesn't mention this going against our guidelines. Disentangling them is important and this way readers can see where there is information on a person and click on the redlinks to see all incoming links. Boleyn (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the two redlinked entries meet MOS:DABMENTION, as both are mentioned within their adjacent bluelinked articles. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten_[meow] 15:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.