Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Boyd Myers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Courtney Boyd Myers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The refs consist of 1/her own web site and 2/an article about her in Forbes, for which she is one of their columnists. Forbes seems to have given her an award, also. DGG ( talk ) 06:38, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She has articles about her in wired.co.uk and the Huffington Post, has contributed to and been an editor for PC Magazine, and is 23rd on Business Insider's list of the 30 Most Important Women Under 30 In Tech. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 12:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - The article may not look pretty right now, but it appears that she is notable, and so with a little cleaning up it should look right. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 15:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.