Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cotes d'Armor (True Rebels)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ansh 666 09:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cotes d'Armor (True Rebels)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. The artist is notable, but not all of his works are. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 00:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Reviews found from jesusfreakhideout ([1]) and Cross Rhythms ([2]), and an article from Christian Today which unfortunately doesn't display properly for me ([3]). I'm not really up on which Christian sources are considered reliable so just putting these here for consideration. --Michig (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per sources presented later in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Article makes no claim of notability. Ifnord (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the source given by Michig above are reliable and the review content is not trivial. The first jesusfreakhideout.com is used on hundreds pages on Wikipedia to support Christian music review while the second though not heavily used but it is listed as reliable in Wiki project Music. (Both results via XL link search). I can't access the third either, but I think these sources can make this pass WP:GNG vis a vis the artist is notable, hence his fans both search for him and his work — Ammarpad (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.