Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core.onion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Core.onion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded by user who said, "Don't speedy delete! Core.onion was one of the important entry points to the Tor .onion network. Let's investigate more about notability." Importance not asserted beyond vague terms such as "long standing". No secondary sourcing found, just passing mentions in books that only verify that it exists, but give no other info whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:WEBCRIT, specifically point one. Searches for "Core.onion" do not yield "multiple non-trivial published works" about the subject. Seattle (talk) 14:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The reason there is not an abundance of search results is that this is a Tor website, not a clearnet website. --dionyziz (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]

WP:ITSNOTABLE. You haven't said anything about why this particular site is notable. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough reliable sources that cover the site substantially. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 20:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good deal of results out there in searches of books and academic sources. — Cirt (talk) 23:29, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find any reliable sources (academic or otherwise) that discuss the subject in any detail. Fails WP:WEBCRIT. - Mr X 16:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.