Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooling denier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied per WP:WASTEOFTIME, SNOWBALL and POINT William M. Connolley (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cooling denier

As per WP:NEO. Original Research by Kauffner. The reference given does not only disagree with scientific consensus but also doesn't use the term 'cooling denier'. It appears the User, who created the article is trying to make a point (see edit summary) of some sort, after his disruptive edits have been reverted by multiple editors and he has been ask to stop: [1] [2] [3]. Splette :) ^{How's my driving?} 14:21, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, original research, no evidence that this phrase is in widespread use. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete well most of its said. WP:OR and (i guess) an attempt at WP:POINT. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have several references to the phrase in actual use now. Google has 61 deghosted examples. I didn't make it up. Splette is recruiting people on talk:Global Warming specifically to attack this article. This seems to be a personal vendetta.Kauffner (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no reliable sources addressing the subject phrase, fails WP:NEO. Article blatantly coat-racky. --Relata refero (disp.) 15:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, this aticle is a POV Fork of the Global warming, global warming controversy, and global warming denial pages. Count Iblis (talk) 15:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, aside from the problems with the article's content, this is a violation of WP:POINT by the article's creator. --Akhilleus (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. You're not speedily deleting this speedy enough already. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 17:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as POV fork. Doesn't meet any speedy criteria. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.