Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool handshakes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:27, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool handshakes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a specific use of handshakes, but there's no reason to have it be a separate article from handshake. I could see some content being merged to there, but it's not really well-written enough to be worth it. Sdkb (talk) 06:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No idea why this even exists, it looks like the work of a new editor who couldn't think of a good article topic. It's definitely not encyclopedic, and there's nothing here worth merging. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 07:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Nathan. Remagoxer (talk) 09:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nathan. Also, this would be impossible to write WP:NPOV as well, as there are no rules on what makes a handshake cool. LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 12:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- User:LakesideMiners is clearly unfamiliar with Stewart's test. Argento Surfer (talk) 16:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  Argento Surfer, is that sarcasm? LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 16:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is!. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.