Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooksonia
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy resolved and closed per WP:TWODABS bd2412 T 02:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cooksonia
- Cooksonia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
User:Peter coxhead and I agree that my move of the page Cooksonia to Cooksonia (plant) was not a good one due to the number of links to the first page and the number of visitors compared to the alternative Cooksonia (butterfly). Therefore please delete Cooksonia disamb. JMK (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think genus disambiguation pages are worthwhile. The plant may be the primary topic, but this page could be moved to Cooksonia (disambiguation) or Cooksonia (genus), rather than being deleted.Plantdrew (talk) 20:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. czar · · 22:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. czar · · 22:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.