Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confluence Project Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Faithful+Gould. RL0919 (talk) 01:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confluence Project Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no independent RS, and I am struggling to find one, but that might be because of all the articles about the Atlassian product. I can find directories and namechecks, but nothing else so far. It was written by user:ConfluencePM. Guy (help!) 21:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep as long as more sourcing can be found.TH1980 (talk) 01:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect to Faithful+Gould: Of the article references, only the Q&A from The MP Report may rise above the routine, though it seems very advertorial, with appended company contact list, rather than in-depth journalistic evaluation. I am not seeing enough to demonstrate WP:NCORP notability. The 2013 acquisition of the firm is mentioned on the Faithful+Gould page, which provides a reasonable redirect target. AllyD (talk) 13:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.