Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conceptual Model Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conceptual Model Theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails our notability guidelines per WP:FRINGE. Not recognized in the relevant academic communities. The entire aritcle appears to be one giant soapbox. ScienceApologist (talk) 06:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks like it should be speedied per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conceptual Model Theory of Human Understanding. Someone should warn the author that we don't do this at Wikipedia. ScienceApologist (talk) 06:13, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — I do not think that the sources match the topic presented in the article, hence fails verifiability by not providing such verifiable sources. MuZemike (talk) 07:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete with suggested rewriting. at present this is an unsourced mudddle. If there is an article here, it will have to be discussed much more clearly, and with adequate references to show it isn't one guy's ideas. DGG (talk) 07:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fringe theory, original research AlexTiefling (talk) 15:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Although related to the earlier AfD, I don't think it's similar enough for a WP:CSD#G4 speedy deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.