Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Tryton and Odoo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone wants to merge any of the information in the article let me know. Davewild (talk) 17:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Tryton and Odoo

Comparison of Tryton and Odoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a useful page for users of the software products in question but not at all encyclopedic. There are a number of software comparison pages, but they typically compare a whole category - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Software_comparisons. Possibility for speedy deletion? If comparisons between any two topics are allowed as topics then the number of pages will rapidly head towards infinity... U2fanboi (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a bad article but I fail to see the point of it existing on it's own If information was taken from this and added to the Tryton page that would be far more agreeable as there is information on this page that is not available on the Tryton page. I propose a merge of some information and a deletion of the rest. Andrdema (talk) 20:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Comparison of two pieces of arbitrary software, themselves of dubious notability. Guy (Help!) 12:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:47, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.