Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compact area group approach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv🍁 16:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Compact area group approach

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never mind that this is still written like a beamer presentation even after the last AfD. Whatever this is exactly, it doesn't seem to be sufficiently notable to write an article about. A single newspaper article can't really sustain this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The previous AfD is under a different title at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compact area group approach (CAGA). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability not established, and nobody has cared enough to improve the article in more than a decade. XOR'easter (talk) 16:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. It has a few hits on Scholar and Book, but <10 each, and mostly related to the publications of the authors. Could consider redirecting to the article about the author, Abdul Kareem, he may be notable - citation count is not bad, also co-authored a lot: [1]. Unfortunately as the disambig shows it is a common name, so confirming his citation count is really his and not divided between several different people is a bit tough. If anyone wants to stub this, ping me and I can change my vote to redirect or such. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.