Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colin Vancao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 09:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Vancao

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, and WP:NACTOR. The current references are obvious databases failing significant coverage. Google Books and Newspaper.com (both archived and non-archived version) have a few hits, 1, 2, 3, but they are obvious non-SIGCOV single hit trivial mentions. Moreover, Vancao's roles for the films are minor instead of being significant/major to meet NACTOR, and all sources covering his roles are just bare mentions or databases. I also don't think a redirect to any of the films are beneficial given this being a mostly unlikely search term given Vancao's extremely minor parts played; and don't think this topic has much potential for drafting. This was previously tagged as A7 by CycloneYoris but declined by Espresso Addict, so taking to AfD is the next logical step. VickKiang (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I had a cursory search after declining the A7 but could not find substantive coverage. He seems to have had a long career with multiple roles in very notable properties but in-depth coverage isn't obvious in the usual online places; perhaps someone else will have more luck. Espresso Addict (talk) 08:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am also not seeing any coverage on this person. Hkkingg (talk) 23:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.