Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colegio Coya

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colegio Coya

Colegio Coya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First of all, I can't find any evidence of notability. But also, this article is such a dumpster fire of irrelevant info, unsourced claims, and incomprehensible English, that it's hard to see any benefit in keeping. Sourcing is going to be hard to come by, but if someone thinks they can manage, this probably needs to be rewritten from scratch anyway. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.