Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coldfront

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cold front. Cirt (talk) 23:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coldfront

Article does not does not cite reliable, 3rd party sources to assert notability within the guidlines for websites. VG ☎ 23:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason we can't redirect to Cold front? Pie is good ^{(Apple is the best)} 00:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect - I dug around a fair bit, and this page didn't meet the 10-15 minute Google News and googling for news tests. Probably no RS available for expansion at this time. On redirecting, note that there are some 19,400 hits on Google (I know, I know - enough with the Google mentions) for "coldfront weather -irc," so it may be warranted. MrZaius^talk 02:31, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Cold front. Is a plausible spelling for that, which is notable. current article is not verified, so should go. even if sources found, should still redirect, and have a hatnote at Cold front for other use.Yobmod (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:11, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.