Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold fusion controversy" on Wikipedia
- (if) the Cold fusion article itself gets put into a decent state, that will be the appropriate time to consider branching off sub-articles on various...4 KB (492 words) - 03:39, 6 February 2023
- that Cold fusion was seen as pathological science in the 1990's, while I favor well-sourced evidence that it is an ongoing scientific controversy to this...22 KB (2,939 words) - 01:24, 2 June 2024
- long-term behavioral dispute with me. He edited Cold fusion while protected in expectation of controversy over it, and contrary to an expressed consensus...54 KB (6,748 words) - 06:33, 27 March 2022
- article. Cold fusion true believers tend to think this is serious science but it has not received the marquee notice that we would expect for such an amazing...21 KB (2,793 words) - 05:37, 20 September 2021
- asking for deletion anyways. --UsaSatsui (talk) 20:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC) How is claiming that I was blocked for being involved in cold fusion not maligning...15 KB (2,014 words) - 09:48, 22 March 2022
- Wikipedia's article from describing cold fusion in terms of 'fringe pseudo-science' to a 'scientific controversy' was a laborious and sometimes heated...263 KB (33,283 words) - 05:02, 3 April 2023
- doesn't mean that the few articles about other noteworthy cold fusion devices should be suddenly up for deletion. Deletion would be an overreaction to...55 KB (7,656 words) - 08:32, 30 December 2021
- don't need cold fusion-level controversy for it. --cyclopiaspeak! 14:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC) No, but we DO need an actually notable controversy. A couple...15 KB (1,862 words) - 19:41, 5 May 2022
- went on to make a total of 64 edits to Cold fusion, through January 30, 2009. Edit summaries showed POV position, for example: 09:26, 26 January 2009 (Further...140 KB (12,245 words) - 04:40, 3 March 2023
- for deletion/Talk:Cold fusion/wip or Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ObsidianOrder/Cold fusion or Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Cold fusion/tmp...61 KB (7,218 words) - 01:35, 2 June 2024
- highly cited paper only has 52 citations. His involvement in E-cat cold fusion controversy does not seem very notable either, but could be mentioned on the...5 KB (523 words) - 23:00, 20 December 2023
- as "Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion" However basically NeilN is wrong, because: 1- In the case of Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion, the article shows a FACT:...45 KB (3,379 words) - 23:01, 27 March 2022
- requires special care, as outlined in a previous arbitration case on cold fusion. Tone 13:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC) Energy Catalyzer (edit | talk | history |...177 KB (24,620 words) - 20:32, 30 May 2022
- speed on cold fusion controversy at the level of educated layman. Then with many more hours of pouring over the extensive record of the cold fusion/fringe...489 KB (75,729 words) - 01:35, 2 June 2024
- will write articles arguing that I'm a damned fool. But we still wouldn't create an article on Wikipedia called Lisa Liel's nifty new cold fusion thingie...39 KB (5,752 words) - 03:48, 1 February 2022
- content of articles, but only whether the topic should have its own article." This subject has been around for years and the foundation cold fusion has been...5 KB (53,059 words) - 15:07, 3 March 2023
- doesn't mean that the few articles about other noteworthy cold fusion devices should be suddenly up for deletion. Deletion would be an overreaction to...5 KB (48,390 words) - 15:09, 3 March 2023
- written and stated what Cold Fusion was without imparting any controversy to the Reader other then to mention that there was a controversy surrounding it. Now...141 KB (17,656 words) - 04:52, 3 March 2023
- relates to cold fusion is perfectly well kept in the cold fusion article. Do you also support the following articles? nuclear detections in cold fusion experiments...5 KB (61,758 words) - 04:33, 5 April 2022
- carrying explosives" and start filling in Pascal Tesson. A background in Cold fusion may help. Publish your theory in a blog so as not to attract peer review...15 KB (1,961 words) - 06:30, 11 February 2023
- work, and accepts a bunch of material with really marginal interest (Cold Fusion Hypothesis, anyone?) while excluding any of these political speeches