Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colby Cosh

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 09:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Colby Cosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not independently notable. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 05:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply: That's irrelevant. Wikipedia policies make it very clear that there's no such thing as inherent notability. J.J. McCullough is much much more notable than Colby Cosh in Canada and his article was deleted for the same reasons Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/J._J._McCullough_(2nd_nomination) -- because there's no such thing as inherent notability. If you want to vote to keep this article, you need to prove that multiple independent reliable sources have covered Colby Cosh, as individual, with in-depth coverage. Note: The sources need to have covered Colby Cosh himself, not just referred to whatever articles he has written about. Not that this is particularly relevant to the AFD anyway, but I'd also dispute your characterisation of Colby Cosh being a "well known columnist in Canada", he has 13.5k twitter followers, that's hardly notable... Apples&Manzanas (talk) 09:24, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.